PHYSICS FLASH
    News from the Department of Physics ~ November 2008

ASU PHYSICS
Department of Physics
Arizona State University
PO Box 871504
Tempe, AZ 85287
480.965.3561

Homecoming 2008
Physics undergrads stage successful event

 ASU Physics once again demonstrated their creativity and team spirit at the 2008 ASU Homecoming Block Party held on Saturday, November 15th. The Society of Physics Students (SPS) along with ASU Physics staff developed a display around the theme "The Physics of Marching Band". SPSers created posters highlighting various physics concepts involved with a marching band including the center of percussion, constructive/destructive interference, and drag. The posters were accompanied by hands-on demonstrations allowing the visitors to experience first-hand the physics at work. The ASU Physics tent drew a diverse audience including children, families, alumni, and ASU administrators. The high point of the event was a brief performance by about 30 members of the Sun Devil Marching Band - who visited the ASU Physics tent in support of the multidisciplinary theme. Thanks to everyone involved in making this year's event such a success: SPSers  Chris Friedline, Murdock Hart Louis Maizy, and Shawna Uher; ASU Physics staff Peg Stuart, Sabrina Mathues, and Tim Cook; and ASU faculty Bob Nemanich, Michael Treacy, Carl Covatto, and Bob Culbertson. A very special thanks to the Sun Devil Marching Band and its director, James Hudson for adding a serious "WOW" factor this year!

   

Top: SPSer Louis Maizy operates the wave function generator for a visitor. Middle: Natural Sciences Dean Sid Bacon discusses the center of percussion with Chris Friedline. Bottom: (L) The ASU Marching band swings by to play the fight song at the ASU Physics tent, (R) Department Manager and former ASU band member Peg Stuart thanks a current band member.

Conference focuses on underground lab
 

ASU particle astrophysics Professor Cecilia Lunardini was co-organizer of the 2008 workshop Underground Detectors Investigating Grand Unification (UDIG), held October 16-17, 2008 and hosted by Brookhaven National Laboratory.
   The workshop, whose acronym came from Professor Lunardini's creativity ("It makes you want to dig underground"), was devoted to the scoping of the nascent underground facility DUSEL or Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory in South Dakota. The conference featured over 30 presentations to an audience of 78 participants.
   The goal of the conference  was to encourage discussions that will help chart a course for progress in these exciting areas, and outline a coherent vision for a multifaceted experimental program. Lunardini  feels that goal was definitely achieved. A second workshop is envisioned for the spring.

ASU Physics' main office will be closed November 27 & 28 for the Thanksgiving recess and will open again on Monday, December 1st.

PAGE 1
 

 
Unraveling quark confinement

by Andrei Belitsky

The past century witnessed enormous progress in unraveling the origin, structure and evolution of the visible matter in the universe—the material that makes up stars, planets, and life forms.
   Our evolving understanding of the structure of matter in XX century was an interplay of theoretical and experimental advances that yielded several paradigm changes that revolutionized physics and technologies that emerged from it. The discovery of radioactive decays and Rutherford scattering experiments, which demonstrated the existence of atomic nucleus, were matched by powerful theoretical foundation: the Einstein’s theory of special relativity, stating that mass and energy were truly interchangeable, and the introduction of quantum mechanics. The realization that nuclear reactions provide the energy that drives the cosmos revolutionized our understanding of the universe. Finally the scattering of high-energy electron beam on nucleons led to the discovery of point-like, i.e., partonic, structure inside the proton and neutron and confirmed that these particles are made of more fundamental building blocks—quarks and gluons, which make up 99 percent of the mass of our everyday world.  The theory which encodes the strong interaction physics was realized to be a gauge field theory called quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Quarks are bound to each other by the strongest force in the universe so tightly that one quark cannot exist by itself. The carries of the force are gluons which are much like photons but come in eight different species and also can directly interact with each other. The latter property creates the main obstacle in solving QCD using the same tools as for its electromagnetic cousin as that contrary to the latter the former becomes strong when one attempts to separate hadronic constituents apart (see Fig. 2) thus making traditional perturbative methods invalid. The main focus of our studies in QCD is understanding the quark confinement and its implications for the structure of hadrons. We use diverse techniques for this purpose, both phenomenological and analytical.       
    One of the most fascinating possibilities of modern electron-scattering experiments is that they can measure the spatial distribution of quarks and gluons, providing actual three-dimensional images of the proton at the femtometer scale. The reconstruction of spatial images from scattering experiments by way of Fourier transform of the observed scattering pattern is a technique widely used in physics, e.g., in X-ray scattering from crystals. Recently, it was discovered how to extend this technique to the spatial distribution of quarks and gluons within the proton, using processes that probe the proton at a tiny resolution scale. Our major contribution in this line of endeavor was in the development of a novel approach to understanding quark confinement through the study of microscopic partonic characteristics of strongly interacting particle based on the concept of generalized parton distributions. This is a rich formalism that both unifies existing descriptions of proton structure and takes a giant leap into unknown territory. In brief, a generalized parton distribution is a relativistic equivalent of the quantum mechanical Wigner quasiprobability distribution and provides complete information about a quantum mechanical state, contrary to conventional probes. It encodes the quantum phase of their wave function not just their absolute value.    (CONTINUED ON PAGE 5)  

PAGE 2

 

BOOK REVIEW  
The Pursuit of Perfect Packing

(2nd edition) by Thomas Aste and Denis Weaire

I enjoyed reading this expanded and updated version of the original book that I had read some years ago. No prior knowledge is required to enjoy the 200 pages over a weekend. I often think about imperfect packing when I throw clothes etc in a bag on a Sunday night before a trip – this book explores the antithesis – what is best way to pack objects of various shapes together in order to minimize the volume. We have all seen oranges close packed in a supermarket, where staggered hexagonal layers are placed one above the other to achieve a packing fraction of  QUOTE   = 0.74; a result that was first conjectured by Kepler in 1607 to be optimal, but only formally proved by Hales in 1998. It was a hard proof because there is a more efficient local packing where 12 spheres are positioned around a central sphere in an icosahedral arrangement, but this can’t be tiled to fill all space. The situation with disc packing in two dimensions is more straightforward as the best local packing where 6 discs are placed uniquely around a central disc, can be tiled to give an optimal packing fraction of  QUOTE   = 0.91. This has some importance to the Irish economy (see Figure 1) which is of importance to Denis Weaire who is a professor at Trinity College, Dublin and with whom I have had the pleasure of co-authoring 11 papers over the years, starting when we were both assistant professors at Yale.

            The book is written in a loose conversational style that holds your attention, although you have to pause to fill in some of the arguments as you read through the assorted packings including soap bubbles, sands and grains, the Giant’s causeway, Voronoi polyhedral, squashed peas and pomegranate pips, honeycombs, concrete, M & M treats, Bucky balls etc. Denis never misses the chance to include an Irish reference, and why not. I did not know that Boris Nickolaevich Delauney was Irish! His surname comes from his Irish ancestor, Deloney, a mercenary in Russia with Napoleon. Delauney is the French transliteration of the name and he found a way to cover space starting with any set of points now widely used in finite element analysis etc and called Delauney triangulation. The book contains something for everyone – did you know that in a close

packing in 8 dimensions, each hypersphere is surrounded by 240 other hyperspheres or that in 24 dimensions this number goes up to 196,560. This is known as the kissing problem, and was first discussed by Isaac Newton and David Gregory in 1694. Should you care? Well perhaps yes, because this can be used to help optimize computer codes in the presence of noise. At the other extreme the largest known loosest packing of spheres in 3d that is stable was discovered by Mike O’Keeffe (who is an Emeritus Chemistry Professor at ASU and of Irish ancestry) in 1996 with a packing density of only 0.1033.

            This book contains a number of unsolved problems which are almost certainly hard, but new solutions in this area keep coming along – a recent example being by Paul Chaikin who showed experimentally (by purchasing a few hundred tetrahedral dice) that regular tetrahedra can be packed to a much higher density than previously suspected at 0.75 and remarkably that this optimal packing seems to be disordered. A neat problem here for someone!

            The highlight of the book is the story of the discovery of the Weaire-Phelan structure, recently used for the swimming and diving events at the 2008 Olympics. Lord Kelvin posed the problem in 1887 “What partitioning of space into equal volumes minimizes their surface area?” Kelvin’s solution was to fill space with tetrakaidecahedra which is perhaps more familiar as the convex Voronoi polyhedron (Wigner-Seitz cell) of the body-centered-cubic lattice. In 1993, Weaire and Phelan
discovered a more efficient packing using two kinds of polyhedra – beating Kelvin by 0.3%, but a win is a win! It has not been proved that the Weaire-Phelan structure is optimal, but it is generally believed to be likely. This discovery was a triumph for interdisciplinary research and was based on a known clathrate structure – it would have been very hard for a mathematician to come up with this. This was the structure used for the water cube, with the advantage that there are only two lengths of struts which meet four at a time at rigid joints. The architects used 90 kilometers of steel beam to make the struts and also cut through the structure at an angle to be pleasing esthetically as shown in Figure 2 just in case you missed seeing this on TV last summer.


Michael Thorpe is ASU Foundation Professor of Physics, Chemistry & Biochemistry. For more information, click HERE.

Happy Thanksgiving
from all of us in ASU Physics!

 

PAGE 3


 

From the Chair...

Physics around us and discoveries that advance knowledge

in our everyday lives and form the basis for technologies that advance our society.    
   It was also evident that our former students still wanted to learn more about physics, and in particular the direction our department is moving now.  We talked about how the boundaries of physics are limited only by the ability to make precise measurements, and that research is becoming ever more interdisciplinary.  ASU Physics students and faculty are working now on problems in biological physics, nanoscale and materials physics, and particle-astrophysics.  Interestingly, these areas would not have been recognized as areas of physics when many of our visitors were taking their physics courses.
   I fully expect that when our current group of undergraduates come back to the Block Party of 2025 and they ask about ASU Physics, the areas of research may again be completely different. Still, the fundamental approaches to advancing our knowledge through experimental and theoretical research continue to be the backbone of our field. 
   One of our visitors asked why study physics now? I looked around and pointed to our enthusiastic (and knowledgeable) students, and noted that joining them would be reason enough. Beyond that, so many of our students are involved with research that leads to discoveries that advance our knowledge.  Discovery is truly the special part of ASU Physics from the past to the future.  

 

Sincerely,

 

Robert J. Nemanich

Homecoming is such a great opportunity to meet the people who have been part of ASU over the years.  Many former students and colleagues came to our tent on November 15th for the ASU Homecoming Block Party - an annual event held just before the football game. Several of our outstanding physics majors demonstrated and explained the science behind a marching band. They engaged the community in experiments that demonstrated the physics encountered by drummers, wind players and the color guard. They showed how instruments are designed for tone and pitch, displayed the complex patterns of sound wave resonances, and described how sound waves interfere to form ‘beats.’  The students answered questions and pointed out the mathematical equations behind these experiments.
   The weather was perfect and everyone had fun learning more physics. To top it all off, the ASU Pep Band gathered around the tent to play the fight song - making our tent the Epicenter of the Block Party.  From my perspective, this was appropriate since physics is indeed at the center of science.
   It was a pleasure spending time talking to our former students about their experiences at ASU.  Several mentioned that our discussion brought back memories of the difficulty in solving physics problems, and their subsequent amazement at the way simple  mathematical equations can be used to describe complex phenomena

Keep in touch and

MAKE A DIFFERENCE
with ASU Physics!


Please consider supporting ASU Physics students, research, and programs. More information on the
ASU Physics website

or by calling 480.965.6794.


Physics Flash

welcomes your feedback. Please send your comments, questions, and story suggestions to
margaret.stuart@asu.edu

PAGE 4

 

Unraveling quark confinement (continued from Page 2)

The forgoing decade witnessed substantial progress in unraveling the intriguing puzzle of hadron's structure through GPDs and endowed us with a phase-space picture of nucleon’s structure (see Fig. 3). Are the up quarks, the down quarks, and the gluons in the proton equally distributed in space? Are the quarks more polarized in the center than at the periphery? Answers to questions like these await and will revolutionize our knowledge of proton structure. Finally, encoded in the GPDs is yet another secret: the orbital angular momentum of the quarks and gluons. With the GPDs, we not only obtain still photographs of the quarks, but we catch them in action as well. Our work laid the ground in the establishment and development of a number of concepts and directions in the field. These results were pivotal to warrant the current state of the art of the field and brought the whole subject to the level when it grew into the main experimental project driving the science of the 12 GeV energy upgrade of the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility in Jefferson Laboratory, Virginia. This $310 million major national project was recently funded by the Office of Nuclear Science of the U.S. Department of Energy.  
 The above phenomenological approach to hadron’s structure has to be complimented by theoretical tools based on first principle calculations. To date, however, the bulk of our theoretical knowledge about QCD has been gained from methods relying on some kind of a perturbative expansion with respect to a small parameter.  This is the case for traditional renormalizable or nonrenormalizable effective field theories.  The major challenge has always been the need to devise nonperturbative techniques overcoming the limitations of perturbative considerations.  The numerical framework of lattice gauge theory, which uses discretized space-time, partially resolves these problems, but one still lacks reliable analytical methods.  Recently, a unifying concept becoming increasingly prominent is integrability. The idea of integrability for interacting particle systems in classical mechanics is associated with Liouville theorem, which states that a mechanical system is integrable provided it has as many conserved quantities as degrees of freedom. Integrability is manifested in diverse physical systems describing different physical phenomena.  Its story starts with the Heisenberg model (1929), which describes of a chain of atoms interacting via nearest-neighbor spin exchange.  The spectrum of the system was solved by Bethe in 1931 using an innovative method now called the coordinate Bethe ansatz.  Later, Liouville's idea was generalized (starting with Skyrme) to construct exact solutions to classical equations of motion of physical nonlinear systems in one space and one time dimension, e.g., the nonlinear sine-Gordon and Korteweg-de Fries wave equations.  Since then the scope of this idea has grown dramatically, and implications of this concept have now been extended to any classical or quantum system that possesses sufficiently many conserved charges such that all physical characteristics can be calculated exactly.  The conservation laws are generally associated with symmetries, and not necessarily Noetherian.  More than that, the symmetries may be hidden, and uncovering them is often a challenging mathematical problem.  And while in principle exact solutions exist, their explicit construction can be extremely nontrivial. However, if these complications are circumvented, quantum field theory breaks free from the limitations of perturbation theory, and previously concealed properties such as, for instance, strong-weak coupling dualities can be revealed. Nowadays, diverse methods have been formulated to identify and solve integrable systems.  For one, the original Heisenberg model, used to describe diverse aspects of ferromagnetism and superconductivity, has been generalized to that for a chain of particles with arbitrary spin, which turns out to be relevant to four-dimensional gauge theories including QCD as was demonstrated by Belitsky-Braun-Derkachov-Korchemsky-Manashov over a decade ago. Recently, a distant cousin of QCD - the so-called maximally supersymmetric field theory – a full-fledged four-dimensional theory was solved by means of generalization of techniques known as the Bethe Ansatz and Baxter equations to long-range interacting systems. Our current work is focused on the extension of this formalism to nonconformal theories like QCD. Successful implementation of these ideas will not only solve one of the most outstanding problems of modern gauge theories – quark confinement - but also will help to establish a close connection between condensed matter and particle physics.

For more information on Professor Andrei Belitsky and his research, click HERE.   

PAGE 5